The Early Norman Castles of the British Isles (Illustrations)Oliver And Boyd, Edinburgh, 2015 M04 3 - 269 pages Example in this ebook The study of earthworks has been one of the most neglected subjects in English archæology until quite recent years. It may even be said that during the first half of the 19th century, less attention was paid to earthworks than by our older topographical writers. Leland, in the reign of Henry VIII., never failed to notice the “Dikes and Hilles, which were Campes of Men of Warre,” nor the “Hilles of Yerth cast up like the Dungeon of sum olde Castelle,” which he saw in his pilgrimages through England. And many of our 17th- and 18th-century topographers have left us invaluable notices of earthworks which were extant in their time. But if we turn over the archæological journals of some fifty years ago, we shall be struck by the paucity of papers on earthworks, and especially by the complete ignoring, in most cases, of those connected with castles. The misfortune attending this neglect, was that it left the ground open to individual fancy, and each observer formed his own theory of the earthworks which he happened to have seen, and as often as not, stated that theory as a fact. We need not be surprised to find Camden doing this, as he wrote before the dawn of scientific observation; but that such methods should have been carried on until late in the 19th century is little to the credit of English archæology. Mr Clark’s work on Mediæval Military Architecture (published in 1884), which has the merit of being one of the first to pay due attention to castle earthworks, counterbalances that merit by enunciating as a fact a mere guess of his own, which, as we shall afterwards show, was absolutely devoid of solid foundation. The scientific study of English earthworks may be said to have been begun by General Pitt-Rivers in the last quarter of the 19th century; but we must not forget that he described himself as a pupil of Canon Greenwell, whose careful investigations of British barrows form such an important chapter of prehistoric archæology. General Pitt-Rivers applied the lessons he had thus learned to the excavation of camps and dykes, and his labours opened a new era in that branch of research. By accumulating an immense body of observations, and by recording those observations with a minuteness intended to forestall future questions, he built up a storehouse of facts which will furnish materials to all future workers in prehistoric antiquities. He was too cautious ever to dogmatise, and if he arrived at conclusions, he was careful to state them merely as suggestions. But his work destroyed many favourite antiquarian delusions, even some which had been cherished by very learned writers, such as Dr Guest’s theory of the “Belgic ditches” of Wiltshire. A further important step in the study of earthworks was taken by the late Mr I. Chalkley Gould, when he founded the Committee for Ancient Earthworks, and drew up the classification of earthworks which is now being generally adopted by archæological writers. This classification may be abridged into (a) promontory or cliff forts, (b) hill forts, (c) rectangular forts, (d) moated hillocks, (e) moated hillocks with courts attached, (f) banks and ditches surrounding homesteads, (g) manorial works, (h) fortified villages. To be continue in this ebook |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 44
... enclosure; and as it is of large size (91⁄2 acres) it is more probable that the outer enclosure was for cattle, than that the inner one was designed solely for the protection of the king and his court. We are not told of stone walls ...
... enclosure, does not appear to have been strengthened by a cross ditch or bank. “It may be noted that this enclosure presents not the slightest appearance of a motte. It is at a lower level than the body of the hill, and belongs most ...
... enclosure within the outer one. They have been carefully surveyed by Mr F. C. J. Spurrell, who has published a plan of them.[93] Each enclosure formed roughly a square with much-rounded corners. The ditch round the outer work was 30 ...
... enclosure is far too small for a borough, and Edward's burh would certainly have enclosed the church; for though the present church contains no Saxon architecture, the ancient cross in the graveyard shows that it stands on a Saxon site ...
... enclosure.[120] They could hardly have escaped by ship, as they did, if their camp had been above the bridge, which is known to have existed in Saxon times. But Boley Hill is above the bridge. 3. MILTON, in Kent (Middeltune).—Hæsten the ...
Contents
APPENDIX D THE WORDS CASTRUM AND CASTELLUM | |
APPENDIX E THE BURGHAL HIDAGE | |
APPENDIX F THELWALL | |
APPENDIX G THE WORD BRETASCHE | |
APPENDIX H THE WORDS HURDICIUM AND HORDIARI | |
APPENDIX I HERICIO ERICIO HERITO HERISSON | |
APPENDIX K THE CASTLE OF YALE | |
APPENDIX L THE CASTLE OF TULLOW OR COLLACHT p 335 | |
CHAPTER VIII MOTTECASTLES IN NORTH WALES | |
CHAPTER IX MOTTECASTLES IN SOUTH WALES | |
CHAPTER X MOTTECASTLES IN SCOTLAND | |
CHAPTER XI MOTTECASTLES IN IRELAND | |
CHAPTER XII STONE CASTLES OF THE NORMAN PERIOD | |
APPENDICES | |
APPENDIX B WATLING STREET AND THE DANELAGH | |
APPENDIX C THE MILITARY ORIGIN OF ALFREDS BOROUGHS | |
APPENDIX M THE CASTLE OF SLANE | |
APPENDIX N THE WORD DONJON | |
APPENDIX O THE ARRANGEMENTS IN EARLY KEEPS | |
APPENDIX P KEEPS AS RESIDENCES | |
APPENDIX Q CASTLES BUILT BY HENRY I | |
APPENDIX R THE SOCALLED SHELL KEEP | |
APPENDIX S PROFESSOR LLOYDS HISTORY OF WALES | |
SCHEDULE OF ENGLISH CASTLES KNOWN TO DATE FROM THE ELEVENTH CENTURY1207 | |
INDEX | |