C.L. 57. An answer to a Discourse intitled, Papists protesting against Protestant-Popery; being a vindication of Papists not Misrepresented by Protestants; and containing a particular examination of Mons. de Meaux late Bp. of Condom his exposition of the doctrine of the church of Rome, in the articles of invocation of saints and the worship of images, occasioned by that discourse. By William Sherlock, D.D.

pp. 131. 4to Lond. 1686

See Cat. No. 20. [State, p. 11.] Contin. p. 10.

C. L. 58. An amicable accommodation of the difference between the misrepresenter and the answerer; in return to the last reply against the papist protesting against protestant popery. Permissu Superiorum. [By the Author of No. 51.]

pp. 40, 4to Lond. 1686

C. L. 59. An answer to the amicable accommodation of the difference between the representer and the answerer. Sherlock, D.D.

By William

pp. 31, 4to Lond. 1686

See Cat. No. 21. [State, p. 12.] Contin. p. 10.

C. L. 60. A reply to the answer of the amicable accommodation, being a fourth vindication of the [first part of the] Papist misrepresented and represented; in which are more particularly laid open some of the principal methods by which the Papists are misrepresented by Protestants in their books and sermons. [By the Author of No. 51.] pp. 46, 4to Lond. 1686

See [State, p. 12.] Contin. p. 10.

C. L. 61. A view of the whole controversy between the representer and the answerer, with an answer to the representer's last reply; in which are laid open some of the methods by which protestants are misrepresented by papists. By William Claget.

pp. 123, 4to Lond. 1687 [State, p. 12.] Contin. p. 10. Ath. Oxon. [Edit. Bliss, vol. iii. col. 640.]

See Cat. No. vol. ii. col. 327.

22.

62. A catechism, truly representing the doctrines and practices of C. L. the church of Rome. With an answer thereunto. By John Williams, M.A. The second edition corrected. With a Vindication of a passage in the said catechism from the exceptions made against it, in a reply to the answer of the amicable accommodation. pp. 82, 8vo 1687 See Cat. No. 23. [State, p. 30.] Ath. Oxon. vol. ii. p. 1119. [Edit. Bliss, vol. iv. col. 769.]

63. The catholic representer, or the papist misrepresented and
represented. Part II. published weekly in 16 single sheets,
with a title and contents. [By the Author of No. 51.] Fif-
teen parts.
pp. 88, 4to Lond. 1687
This came out in weekly parts, each part called a chapter. Chaps.
i.-vi. are in single sheets of eight pages each. Chaps. viii.-xvi. are
in half sheets. A titlepage and table of contents [4 pp.] were added.
J. H. T.

64. The papist represented and not misrepresented; being an C. L. answer to the first sheet of the second part of the papist misrepresented and represented; and for the farther vindication. of the catechism truly representing the doctrines and practices of the church of Rome. By John Williams, M.A.

pp. 14, 4to Lond. 1687

See Cat. No. 24. [State, p. 31.] Ath. Oxon. vol. ii. p. 1121. [Edit. Bliss, vol. iv. col. 769.]

65. The papist represented and not misrepresented; being in answer C. L. to the second sheet of the second part of the papist misrepresented and represented, in the point of their praying to the cross, [and for a further vindication of the catechism truly representing the doctrines and practices of the church of Rome.] By John Williams, M.A. pp. 14, 4to 1687

See Cat. No. 25. [State, p. 31.] Ath. Oxon. vol. ii. col. 1119. It is curious that Wood, although he gives Nos. 64 and 69, in his list of John Williams's works, omits No. 65. This must have been a

mere oversight; but Dr. Bliss has not supplied the defect. The clause in brackets in the title as above has been omitted by Gee and Peck. It is added here from the original. J. H. T.

C. L. 66. Transubstantiation no doctrine of the primitive fathers, being a defence of the Dublin letter herein against the papist misrepresented and represented, Part II. cap. 3. [By John Patrick, M.A. preacher at the Charterhouse.]

pp. 72, 4to Lond. 1687 See Cat. No. 26. Contin. p. 22 [and p. 70]. I cannot find any copy of "the Dublin letter," nor can I tell who was its author. Dr. Wake,

Contin. (p. 22) says, "The next that gave occasion to the revival of this controversy" [i.e. the next after the author of a Discourse of Transubstantiation (Tillotson, 1685), see No. 125] was the author of the Dublin Letter, who being answered by the Representer in his second part, cap. 3, a learned man of our communion [viz. John Patrick] made good his party in an excellent discourse," &c. The Representer (loc. cit.) quotes what these authors call "the Dublin letter," under the title of "The Papists doctrine of Transubstantiation not agreeable to the Primitive Fathers." But I can find no title answering to this title in the Catal. of the Dublin Univ. or of the Bodl. Libraries; nor does it appear in Abp. Marsh's Library, or in the large collection of these tracts in the Library of Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin. J. H. T.

C. L. 67. Wholesome advices from the blessed Virgin to her indiscreet worshippers. Written by one of the Roman Communion, and done out of the French into English, by a Gentleman of the Church of England, with a Preface shewing the Motives to the Translation. [Anon.] By James Taylor, Gent.

pp. 20, 4to Lond. 1687

See Cat. No. 27. [State, p. 27. Contin. p. 53.] This tract is by Mr. Adam Widenfelt, "a person of high employment under the Prince of Suarzemburgh." (Translator's Pref.) It is alluded to, and the Preface attacked, by the Representer (No. 63) part ii. cap. 4, p. 29, and therefore comes into this controversy, as its object was to shew that authors of the Romish Communion made the same repre

sentation of abuses of which Protestants complain.

Taylor is the

translator of the book and the author of the Preface. J. H. T.

The original work is mentioned in "A Catalogue of Books exclusively relating to the Church of Rome: her doctrines, worship, discipline, controversies and annals; including the Histories of her various Religious Orders; their peculiar Missals, Breviaries, &c.: the Tracts published during the reign of James II.; and a set of Canonizations from 1800 to the present time. On sale by Howell and Co., 295, Holborn, London, 1829."

66

Widenfeldt, Avis Salutaires de la bienheureuse Vierge Marie à ses Devots Indiscrets, fidelement traduit en François, avec le Latin ensuite (par Gerberon) à Lille 1674. Monita vere salutaria Mariæ Regina Sanctorum omnium, authore Cremerio, Antverpiæ 1764. Lettre Pastorale de M. l'Evesque de Tournay aux Fidelles de son Diocese sur le Culte de la tres Saincte Vierge et des Saincts, a Lille 1674, &c. &c. The curious work which forms the first in the above Collection is an attack on the worship of the Virgin, in which the author puts into her mouth, that she detests the worship because God alone ought to be honoured and loved. It created a great noise at the time of its publication, and was the cause of no less than fortyseven writings being published on both sides of the question. Its end however was being strictly prohibited, first by the Inquisition and then at Rome. The two next in the volume were published in favour of it."

68. A Letter to the Misrepresenter of Papists. Being a Vindica- C. L. tion of that part of the Protestant Preface to the Wholesome Advices from the blessed Virgin &c. which concerns the Protestants' charity to Papists, and a Layman's writing in it. In answer to what is objected against it in the 4th Chapter of the second part of the Papist Misrepresented &c. By the same Layman [i.e. James Taylor] who translated the Wholesome Advices &c., and made the Preface to them.

pp. 16, 4to Lond. 1687 See Cat. No. 28. [State, p. 28. Contin. p. 53.] It seems as if Dr. Clagett, State, p. 28, imagined this tract to have been written by the Representer, and written on the popish side; but this error Dr. Wake corrects.

Contin. p. 53. J. H. T.

C. L. 69. The Papist represented and not misrepresented, being an answer to the fifth and sixth chapters of the second part of the Papist misrepresented and represented, as far as concerns praying to images and the cross. And for a further vindication of the Catechism truly representing the Doctrines and Practices of the Church of Rome. [Anon.] By John Wil

liams, M.A.

pp. 14, 4to Lond. 1687

See Cat. No. 29. [State, p. 31.] Ath. Oxon. vol. ii. col. 1121.

[Bliss, vol. iv. col. 771.]

C.L. 70. The peoples right to read the Holy Scripture asserted. In answer to the 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th chapters of the second part of the Popish Representer. [Anon.] By Nicholas Stratford D.D. [afterwards Bishop of Chester]

pp. 88, 4to [Lond] 1687 [Contin. p. 39.] Ath. Oxon. vol. ii. col. 1067.

See Cat. No. 30. Born 1633, died 1707. From the year 1667 to 1683 he was Warden of Manchester. "August 29th (Thursday) Mr. Stratford, the new Warden, was this day installed. A stranger, unthought of, unknown of, unsought for; and of all that we thought of, none so likely to be a mercy to this place. A good man, of a sweet temper, brave scholar and preacher; and one that hath an estate of his own, and seems to resolve to settle in the place and to reside. This we thought then; and then, it was so."- Autobiography of Henry Newcome, vol. i., printed for the Chetham Society, 1852.

C. L. 71. The present State of the controversie between the Church of England and the Church of Rome; or an account of the books written on both sides. [In a letter to a friend. Imprimatur. Guil. Needham, May 7, 1686.] (Anon.) By William Clagett, DD. pp. 36, 4to Lond. 1687

See Contin. vol. i. pp. 10, 11. Ath. Oxon. vol. ii. P. 327. The state of the controversy on the Popish side will be found in the Preface to the Reply to the defence of the exposition of the doctrine of the Church of England [No. 79 infra.] J. H. T.