Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

of both Mackenzie and Nisbet abound with references to the Heraldry of the Houses in question.

He trusts that it is quite unnecessary for him to disclaim any intention to cause offence in his strictures on what he considers to be heraldic irregularities; for most of which, indeed, the Authorities of the Lyon Office are responsible, and not the families by whom these irregularities are exhibited. In his anxiety to avoid such a result, he at one time entertained the idea of resorting to what lawyers call the "A. B." system of illustration; but he soon found that a hypothetical mode of treatment was not calculated to explain his views with sufficient clearness, and that the actual mention of names was desirable, if not absolutely necessary.

With reference to the Dedication, the author thinks it right to state that, in accordance with the permission of the lamented Lord Eglinton, he hoped to have published the work under his Lordship's living patronage, but-dis aliter visum.

He embraces this opportunity of acknowledging the valuable assistance he has received during the progress of the work, more particularly from Lord Lindsay, Mr. David Laing, Mr. William Fraser of the Register House, and Mr. William Anderson of the Lyon Office. He also begs to express his great obligations to Mr. James Drummond, R. S. A., and Mr. Robert Frier, for their ready and skilful aid in the preparation of several of the illustrations.

The author may state that his mode of treatment implies a knowledge of at least the elements of Heraldry ;

[blocks in formation]

and while he has endeavoured to show that the "Science" of Blazon is by no means devoid of interest, his chief aim has been to make the subject both instructive and popular, without giving undue promi nence to those drier and less acceptable details which a treatise on the Law of Heraldry must necessarily embrace.

ST. BENNET's, GREENHILL,

EDINBURGH, 10th March 1863.

CONTENTS.

PAGE

[blocks in formation]

SECT. 1.—State of the Existing Register of Arms,

Sir David Lindsay's Register, 1542-Its contents, arrangement, etc.-
Blank from middle of 16th century to 1672-Conjectured destruction
of the Record-Traditionary conflagration—Official return of 1800—
Lyon Register from 1672 to present time-Its incompleteness in con-
sequence of neglected registration - Other sources of Heraldic infor-
mation- Nisbet's laborious researches-His nominal patronage by the
Scottish Parliament--Contents of the first volume of the Lyon
Register-Description of the subsequent volumes-Beautiful execution
of the later Illuminations and descriptive Blazonry-Statutory pro-
visions relative to Matriculation not strictly enforced Right to Arms

66

Provision relative to congruent differences" in Act of 1672-
Nisbet's Essay on Marks of Cadency-Permanent additional figures
-Temporary Differences Opinions of Dugdale and Mackenzie-
Irregularities in Differencing-Principal and additional charges-
Various modes of distinction-Assumption of additional figures
-Chevron, Bordure, etc.-- Variation of their forms-Label, Ribbon,
and Bend Ordinaries charged with other figures-Additional
charge in centre of Shield-Alteration of Tinctures -- Counterchanging
---Principal figures under accidental forms-Couping and erasing-
Altered position of charges—Increase and diminution-Quartering of
other Arms-" Plain-quartered" Coats-Arms of Heiresses-Postpone-
ment of paternal bearings -“Quartered" Coats-"Quarterly quartered"
Coats - Inescutcheons-Various modes of Marshalling-Transposed
Quarterings-Genealogical Pennons-Secondary object of Differences
Commemoration of Alliances, Actions, and Employments-Varied

differences in the same family-Arms of Superiors-Abandonment of

paternal bearings- Similar Arms borne by different Surnames, and

vice versû Armorial controversies in olden times-Adoption of

different Crests,

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »