Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

ERRATA.

Page 65, line 22.

Page 286, line 2.

For "proved 1633," read "proved 1533. '

Delete "It is still used as a chapel."

Leathley or Lelay of Leathley.

Evrard, a vassal of William de Percy's, held=
Leathley and other manors in Yorkshire

at the time of the Domesday Survey.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

SIGI

William de Lelay=Margery, dau. of
Hugh de Lelay.

Walter; of
Carlton.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

The Family of Leathley or Lelay.

By W. PALEY BAILDON, F.S.A.

THE earliest holders of Baildon, after Domesday, of whom we have any record, are the Lelays. The whole subsequent manorial history turns upon them, and it is not improbable that they represent the owner of Baildon in the time of William the Conqueror. Moreover, as they have received scant attention at the hands of Yorkshire genealogists, I may be pardoned for treating their history at some length.

They were descended from EBRARD or EVRARD, a vassal of the Percys, who held four carucates of land in Ledelai (Leathley) at the time of Domesday, besides other property in the West Riding and in Lincolnshire. Evrard's surname is nowhere mentioned. His various manors were as follows:

fo. 3016. Land of the King. Manor. In Castelai (Castley) Eluuin had one carucate to be taxed, and Berne and Elflet had one carucate. There is land for two ploughs. Ebrard, a man of William de Perci's, cultivates (colit) it, but William does not vouch for it. T.R.E. worth ten shillings, now sixteen pence.

fo. 322. Land of William de Perci. Manor. In Ledelai (Leathley) Archil had four carucates to be taxed, where there may be two ploughs. Now Ebrard holds it of William. He himself has two ploughs there and five villans, and three bordars have two ploughs; a mill worth two shillings; two acres of meadow. T.R.E. worth forty shillings, now twenty-four shillings.

fo. 3216. Land of William de Perci. Manor and Soke. In Haghedenebi (Hagenby near Tadcaster-disappeared) Archil had three carucates to be taxed, where there may be two ploughs. The soke is in Hailaga [Helaugh]. Now Ebrard has it of William. He himself has one plough, and there are two villans and a bordar with one plough. Four acres of meadow, etc. T.R. E. value twenty shillings, now twenty-four shillings.

fo. 322. Land of William de Perci. Six manors. In Lintone, Wiber, Ulf, Ravenchil, Ruschil, Ber and Ulchil had eight and a half carucates of land to tax, where there may be four ploughs. Now Ebrard holds it of William. He himself has one plough, and three villans and two bordars have one plough; a mill worth sixteen shillings, etc. T.R.E. worth sixty shillings, now forty shillings.

This paper is taken from the Author's collections for a "History of Baildon," to be published hereafter; the right of reprinting is reserved.

« PreviousContinue »