TABLE OF CASES CITED. Midland Coal, Coke, and Iron Company, re; Craig's Claim (71 L. T. Rep. 705; (1895) Ch. 267, 275) 420, 421 Midland Railway Company v. Daykin (17 C. B. 126) 685 Midland Railway Company v. Edmonton Union Mumford v. Oxford, &c., Railway Company (1 H. & N. 34) .page 36 Munday, re; ex parte Allam (14 Q. B. Div. 43).. Municipal Conncil of Sydney v. Bourke (L. T. Rep. 605) Municipality of Pictou v. Geldert (69 L. T. Rep. 510; (1893) A. C. 524) Murray v. Simpson (8 Ir. C. L. Rep. (App.) xlv.) 865 Muskett v. Hill (5 B. N. C. 694) 59 787 605, 787 187 143 Mutual Life Assurance Society v. Langley (54 L. T. 85, 575 724 N. Price v. Jenkins (36 L. T. Rep. 237; 37 Ib. 54; 4 ...page 715, 718 702 Prince Albert v. Strange (1 Mac. & G. 35, 45) 691 840 Perry r. The Chelton Coal Company Limited (2 Seton, 5th edit., p. 1685) 486 Perry-Herrick v. Attwood (30 L. T. Rep. O. S. 267; 25 Beav. 205; 2 De G. & J. 21) Peters v. Tilley (11 P. Div. 145) 477, 479 Prinz Heinrich, The (58 L. T. Rep. 593; 6 Asp. 900 504 120 Prodgers. Langham (Sid. 133) 870 Petty r. Daniel (55 L. T. Rep. 745; 35 Ch. Div. 172) Pettitmangin, ex parte (referred to in a note to Reg. v. Allen and others, 33 L. J. 98, M. C., at p. 99) Prudential Assurance Company v. Knott (31 L. T. 339 194 Pryce v. Monmouthshire Canal and Railway Com 491 Phantom, The (L. Rep. 1 Adm. & Ecc, 58). Philipson v. Emanuel (56 L. T. Rep. 858) Phillips . Berryman (3 Doug, 286). Phillips v. Dixon (8 C. B. N. S.) 900 pany (40 L. T. Rep. 650; 4 App. Cas. 197) Prytherch, re; Prytherch v. Williams (42 Ch. Div. 590) 633 379 681 Pugh v. Drew (17 W. R. 988) 489 Pugh v. Duke of Leeds (Cowp. 714)... 64 204 Philotaze, The (37 L. T. Rep. 540; Asp. Mar. Pullman v. Hill and Co. (64 L. T. Rep. 691; (1891) 531 Law. Cas. 512) 332 Philpott v. Lehain (35 L. T. Rep. 855) 348 Pye, ex parte (18 Ves. 140; 2 Wh. & Tud. L. C., 223 Phipps and another v. Hale (L. Rep. 3 Prob. & Pyer v. Carter (1 H. & N. 916) 139 Div. 166).... 475 Pyle Works, re (62 L. T. Rep. 887; 44 Ch. Div. Phipps v. Lord Mulgrave (3 Ves. 613) 306 Phoenix Bessemer Steel Company re (32 L. T. Rep. Pym v. Lockyer (12 Sim. 394) 294 854: 44 L. J. 683, Ch.) 306 Pickard v. Sears (6 A. & E. 469) 102 Pickering Lythe East Highway Board v. Barry (45 L. T. Rep. 655; 8 Q. B. Div. 59). Pigg v. Clarke (3 Ch. Div. 672) Pillers, ex parte (44 L. T. Rep. 691; 15 Ch. Div. 653) 560 575 Pitt v. Jones (43 L. T. Rep. 385; 5 App. Cas. 651) R. 409 Pitt . Pitt (1 Ct. Sess. Cas. 3rd Series, 106; 10 876 R. v. Shipley (4 Douglas 73).. 526 281 Raby v. Ridehalgh (25 L. T. Rep. O. S. 19; 7 De 769 259, 870 Poad r. Watson (6 El. & B. 606) 322 Railway Sleepers Supply Company, re (52 L. T. 855 690 Ramsden v. Dyson (L. Rep. 1 H. of L. 129)... 259, 872 Rankin v. Huskisson (4 Sim. 13). 564 482 Ponsonby v. Ponsonby (51 L. T. Rep. 174; 9 P. Div. 122) 900 Rasbotham v. Shropshire Union Railways and Canal (48 L. T. Rep. 904; 24 Ch. Div. 113)... Ratcliffe v. Barnes (6 L. T. Rep. 658; 2 Sw. & Tris. 486) 790 119 Pontifex v. Foord (49 L. T. Rep. 808; 12 Q. B. Div. 152) 146 Ratcliffe r. Evans (66 L. T. Rep. 794; (1892) 2 Q. B. Div. 524). 335 Poole and Forden Highway Board v. Gunning and others (46 L. T. Rep. 163; 51 L. J. 49, M. C.)... Poole v. Warren (8 Ad. and Ell. 582, 587). 63 537 Rathbone, re; ex parte Paterson (57 L. T. Rep. 420; 56 L. J. 504, Q. B.) 313 Pott v. Todhunter (5 L. T. Rep. O. S. 144; 2 Coll. 77) 253 Pottinger, ex parte; re Stewart (38 L. T. Rep. 432; 8 Ch. Div. 621) 44 Potts v. The Birmingham and Warwick Canal Navigation Company (Kay, 142) 545 R. Bolton and Co., re; Salisbury-Jones and Dale's case, äe (71 L. T. Rep. 284; (1895) 1 Ch. 333)... 423 Read v. Anderson (48 L. T. Rep. 74; 51 L. T. Rep. 285, 399 55; 13 Q. B. Div. 779). Reddaway v. The Bentham Hemp Spinning Company (67 L. T. Rep. 301; (1892) 2 Q. B. 639)... Reed, re (unreported). 73 821 Poulett r. Hill (68 L. T. Rep. 476; (1893) 1 Ch. 277) 857 Reed, Bowen, and Co., re; ex parte Official Receiver (4 Morr. 225) 645 Reg. v. Ackworth (13 L. J. 38, M. C.). Reg. v. Adamson (1 Q. B. Div. 201). 215 215 143 Reg. v. Adderley (2 Doug. 463) 237 Powell . Salisbury (2 Y. & J. 391). 293 Powers, re; Lindsell v. Phillips (53 L. T. Rep. 647; 30 Ch. Div. 291). Reg. v. Allen and others (33 L. J. 98, M. C.) 469 194 682 259) 840 Powys r. Mansfield (3 My. & Cr. 359) 328 Reg. v. Blanshard (13 Q. B. 318) 215 Price v. James (67 L. T. Rep. 543; (1892) 2 Q. B. 428) Pratt v. Inman (61 L. T. Rep. 760; 43 Ch. Div. 175) 409 Price . Griffith (1 De G. M. & G. 80).. Reg. v. Boale (21 Q. B. Div. 284) 302 382 Reg. v. Bolton (1 Q. B. 66; 5 Jur. 1154) 212 215 Reg. v. Bradshaw (2 Ell. & Ell. 836; 28 L. J. 176, M.C.) 806 ין Reg. v. The Justices of Bristol (18 Jur. 426; 3 E. & B. 479, n.). Reg. v. Smith (19 L. J. 80, M. C.; Den. C. C. 510; 2 C. & K. 882). 157 212, 215 Reg. v. The Justices of Cheshire (11 Ad. & E. 139). 215 Reg. v. The Justices of the City of York (1 Ad. & El. 828) Reg. v. The Justices of Glamorganshire (60 L. T. Rep. 536; 22 Q. B. Div. 628; 66 L. T. Rep. 444; (1882) 1 Q. B. 621) 212, 215 Reg. v. The Justices of Kingston-upon-Thames (E. B. & E. 256; 27 L. J. 199, M. C.) Reg. v. The Justices of Middlesex (9 Ad. & El. 540, at p. 546)... Reg. v. Justices of Middlesex; re Slade (36 L. T. 212 395 212 212 Rendall v. Blair (63 L. T. Rep. 265; 45 Ch. Div. Rogers v. Macnamara (14 C. B. 27; 23 L. J. 1, C. P.) 492 Rogers and Co. v. Lambert and Co. (64 L. T. Rep. 406; (1891) 1 Q. B. 318) 99 Rook v. Hopley (38 L. T. Rep. 649; 3 Ex. Div. 209) 499 Root . French (cited in Kingsford v. Merry, 1 H. & N. 515)... 101 Ross r. Adcock (19 L. T. Rep. 202; 3 C. P. 655) . 259 Rossiter v. Miller (39 L. T. Rep. 173; 3 App. Cas. 1124) Scott v. Sebright (57 L. T. Rep. 421; 12 P. Div. 21) 124 462 423 488, 625 |