Page images
PDF
EPUB

Mont

gomery and his five sons.

CHAP. VIII. English castles and English towns and villages. But there is only one shire in Great Britain which has had the name of a Norman lordship impressed upon it for ever. Roger of Roger, the present Lord of Montgomery, was, at the time of Duke Robert's death, in banishment at Paris.1 His five sons remained in Normandy, and were among the foremost disturbers of the peace of the country.2 But one of the five, Hugh, had a son, named, like his grandfather, Roger, who bore a better character and was destined to a higher fate. He had, through his mother, a connexion of the usual kind with the ducal house. Weva, a sister of Gunnor, was the wife of Thorulf of Pont-Audemer, the son of Torf, and her daughter Joscelina was the wife of Hugh of Montgomery, and mother of the younger Roger. On this Roger, William Talvas, in his old age, bestowed the hand of his daughter Mabel, who handed on the name, the honours, and the hereditary wickedness of the house of William of Belesme to her sons of the house of Montgomery.5

The younger Roger.

His wife Mabel, daughter

Talvas.

6

Mabel, small in stature, talkative, and cruel, guilty of fearful crimes and destined to a fearful doom, fills a place in history fully equal to that filled by her husband. Of him we shall hear again as literally the foremost among the conquerors of England; we shall see him enriched with English estates and honours, bearing the lofty

1 Will. Gem. vii. 2.

2 Ib.

[ocr errors]

"In Normanniâ summopere inserviebant diris facinoribus." 3 Ib. viii. 37. * Ib. viii. 35. Ib. vii. 16. See above, p. 184. William gives the daughters of Roger and Mabel a good character. Of the sons he says, Illi ferales et cupidi, et inopum rabidi oppressores exstiterunt. Quam callidi, vel militares, seu perfidi fuerint, aut quantum super vicinos paresque suos excreverint, iterumque sub eis pro facinoribus suis decederint, non est nostrum in hoc loco enarrare."

6 Ib.

"Præfata mulier erat corpore parva, multumque loquax, ad malum satis prompta, et sagax atque faceta, nimiumque crudelis et audax." Above, vii. 10, she is "Mabilia, crudelissimæ sobolis mater." So Ord. Vit. 470 A; "Præfata Mabilia multum erat potens et sæcularis, callida et loquax, nimiumque crudelis."

THE HOUSE OF MONTGOMERY.

195

titles of Earl of Arundel and Shrewsbury, and, once at CHAP. VIII. least, adorned with the loftier title which had been borne by Ethelred and Leofric. Once, and that while engaged 1087. in rebellion against his prince, he flits before us for a moment as Roger Earl of the Mercians.1 A munificent friend of monks both in England and in Normandy, he has left behind him a different reputation from that of either his father, his wife, or his sons. In one of those sons we shall see the name of his maternal ancestors revive, and, with their name, a double portion of their wickedness.

William of

Duke Wil

Vaudreuil.

But we have as yet to deal with the house of Montgomery only in its least honourable aspect. William, son Attempt of of the elder, and uncle of the younger, Roger, stands Montcharged with an attempt, aimed no longer at guardians gomery on or tutors, but at the person of the young Duke himself. liam at William was staying with his guardian Osbern at Vaudreuil, a castle on an island in the Eure, said to have been the place of captivity of the famous Fredegunda in Merowingian times.2 Thorold, it would seem, had been already murdered, but his assassins are spoken of only in general terms. But Osbern still watched over his young lord day and night. But he was butchered at Vaudreuil by Murder of William of Montgomery in the very bedchamber of the Duke, and the young prince owed his own safety on this, the Duke. and on many other occasions, to the zealous care of his maternal uncle Walter. Many a time did this faithful kinsman carry him from palace and castle to find a lurkingplace in the cottages of the poor. The blood of Osbern

1 Ord. Vit. 667 B. "Rogerius Merciorum Comes."

2 Will. Gem. vii. 2. See Palgrave, iii. 198; Stapleton, i. cxxvi.

3 Will. Gem. ib. "Deinde [after the death of Gilbert] Turoldus teneri Ducis pædagogus perimitur a perfidis patriæ desertoribus."

This is the way in which I read the story in William of Jumièges (vii. 2), compared with that put into Duke William's own mouth by Orderic (656 C). Sir Francis Palgrave seems to make Thorold and Osbern

Osbern;

escape of

L

CHAP. VIII. was soon avenged; a faithful servant of the murdered Seneschal presently did to William of Montgomery as William of Montgomery had done to Osbern.1 In the state of things in Normandy at that moment crime could be punished only by crime. The remembrance of the faithful Osbern lived also in the memory of the Prince whose Friendship childhood he had so well guarded. His son William grew Duke with up from his youth as the familiar friend and counsellor of his namesake the Duke. This is that famous William Fitz-Osbern who lived to be, next to the Duke himself, the prime agent in the Conquest of England, who won, far more than the Duke himself, the hatred of the conquered people, and who at last perished in a mad enterprise after a wife and a crown in Flanders.

of the

William

Fitz-
Osbern.

Rebellion and death

The next enemy was Roger of Toesny, whom we have of Roger of already heard of as a premature Crusader, the savage foe Toesny. of the Infidels of Spain.2 Disappointed in his dream of a kingdom in the Iberian peninsula, he returned to his native land to find it under the sway of the son of the Tanner's daughter. The proud soul of the descendant of

be murdered at once (199). But William of Jumièges seems to make these
murders two distinct events. After the passage just quoted he goes on;

"Osbernus quoque .
quâdam nocte, dum in cubiculo Ducis cum ipso in
Valle Rodoili securus soporatur, repente in stratu suo a Willelmo Rogerii
de Monte-gumeri filio jugulatus." Orderic puts the murders of Gilbert,
Thorold (or Thurcytel), and Osbern together in general terms; "Turche-
tillum nutricium meum et Osbernum Herfasti filium, Normanniæ dapiferum,
Comitemque Gislebertum patrem patriæ, cum multis aliis reipublicæ neces-
sariis fraudulenter interfecerunt." The murder of Osbern can hardly fail
to have been one of the occasions so pathetically referred to in Orderic;
'Noctibus multotiens cognatorum timore meorum a Gualterio avunculo
meo de camerâ principali furtim exportatus sum, ac ad domicilia latebrasque
pauperum, ne a perfidis, qui ad mortem me quærebant, invenirer, translatus
sum."

[ocr errors]

1 Will. Gem. vii. 2. "Barno quippe de Glotis, præpositus Osberni, injustam necem domini sui cupiens ulcisci, nocte quâdam expeditos pugiles congregavit, et domum, ubi Willelmus et complices sui dormiebant, adiit, ac omnes simul, sicut meruerant, statim trucidavit."

2 See vol. i. p. 460.

REVOLT OF ROGER OF TOESNY.

197

Malahulc scorned submission to such a lord; "A bastard OHAP. VIII. is not fit to rule over me and the other Normans." "1 He refused all allegiance, and began to ravage the lands of his neighbours. The one who suffered most was Humfrey de Vetulis, a son of Thorulf of Pont-Audemer and of Weva the sister of Gunnor. He sent his son Roger of Beaumont against the aggressor. A battle followed, in which Roger of Toesny and his two sons were killed, and Robert of Grantmesnil received a mortal wound. This fight was fought rather in defence of private property than in the assertion of any public principle. But the country gained by the destruction of so inveterate an enemy of peace as Roger of Toesny. And here, as at every step of this stage of our narrative, we become acquainted with men whose names are to figure in the later portion of our history. Robert of Grantmesnil was the father of Houses of Hugh of Grantmesnil, who had no small share in the nil and conquest of England and the division of its spoil. Roger of Beaumont became the patriarch of the first house of the Earls of Leicester. One of his descendants played an honourable part in the great struggle between King and Primate in the latter half of the twelfth century,3 and his honours passed by female succession to that great deliverer who made the title of Earl of Leicester the most glorious in the whole peerage of England.*

1 Will. Gem. vii. 3. "Comperiens autem quod Willelmus puer in Ducatu patri successerit, vehementer indignatus est, et tumide despexit illi servire, dicens quod nothus non deberet sibi aliisque Normannis imperare."

2 See Will. Gem. vii. 3, viii. 37; Ord Vit. 460 C.

3 Garnier, Vie de S. Thomas, 1830 (p. 66 ed Hippeau); "E cil [quens] de Leicestre, ke mut par est senez." So William Fitz-Stephen (i. 235 Giles); "Comes Legecestriæ Robertus, qui maturitate ætatis et morum aliis prominebat;" and Herbert of Bosham (i. 147 Giles); “Nobilis vir Robertus, tunc Leicestræ Comes, inter honoratos honoratior."

Amicia, daughter of Robert, third Earl of Leicester, married Simon the Third, Lord of Montfort. She was the mother of Simon the leader of the Crusade against the Albigenses, and the grandmother of our own Simon the Righteous. See Pauli, Simon von Montfort, 19, 20.

Grantmes

Beaumont.

CHAP. VIII.

Ralph of Wacey chosen as

guardian.

By this time William was getting beyond the years of childhood, and he was beginning to display those extraordinary powers of mind and body with which nature had endowed him. He could now in some measure exercise a will of his own. He still needed a guardian, but, according to the principles of Roman Law, he had a right to a voice in the Duke's determining who that guardian should be. He summoned the chief men of his Duchy, and, by their advice, he chose as his own tutor and as Captain-General of the armies of Normandy, Ralph the son of Archbishop Robert. The choice seems a strange one, as Ralph was no other than the murderer of William's former guardian Count Gilbert.2 But it may have been thought politic for the young Duke to strengthen his hands by an alliance with a former enemy, and to make, as in the case of Count Alan of Britanny, a practical appeal to the honour of a possible rival. The appointment of Ralph seems in fact to have had that effect. A time of comparative internal quiet now followed. But still there were traitors in the land. Many, we are told, of the Norman nobles, even of those who professed the firmest fidelity to the Duke, and were loaded by him with the highest honours, still continued to plot against him in secret.3 For a while they no longer revolted openly on their own account; but there was a potentate hard by whose ear was ever open to their suggestions, and who was ever ready to help them in any plots against their sovereign and their country.

1 Will. Gem. vii. 4. "Rodulphum de Wacceio ex consultu majorum sibi tutorem eligit, et principem militiæ Normannorum constituit."

2 See above, p. 193.

3 The expressions of William of Jumièges (vii. 4) are remarkable ; "Henricum igitur Regem Francorum adeunt, et titiones ejus per Normannicos limites hac illacque spargunt. Quos nominatim litteris exprimerem, si inexorabilia eorum odia declinare nollem. Attamen non alii exstiterunt, vobis in aure loquor circumstantibus, quam hi qui fideliores se profitentur et quos nunc majoribus Dux cumulavit honoribus."

« PreviousContinue »