speaks of the more than ordinary favour and respect which he found above any of his equals, at the courteous and learned men, the pillars of the college, where he spent some years, and, who, at his parting, requested him to remain among them by letters full of kindness and loving respect. This is the view of the subject, which the editor of the Aldine edition of Milton first took; which was supported by additional proofs in our Magazine of November 1836; which was approved by Sir Egerton Brydges, in his edition; and which we believe includes all the facts on the subject that are necessary to be known. More than a century after, the sister University was attacked in the same manner for presenting these brabblements of logic and metaphysics to the students, in the place of solid and wholesome food. See Amherst's Terræ Filius, p. 5, et passim; and Roger Coke's Detection, p. 22, p. 665. Of the Poetry scattered through these numbers, though there is a good Sonnet to Bentley, and not a bad one to Newton, yet Mr. Wilmot's * Dream of the Poets is decidedly the best, and is a very elegant composition; from this, therefore, we must make our extract; and, first, for Milton: "Far off thy radiant coming shines, O bard of Paradise! around Darting the living splendour of thy lines : Then follow the portraits of Cowley and Crashaw, which are drawn with taste and elegance; but we must reserve for our closing extract, the lines on B. Jonson and Gray. "Would thou wert living at this hour, Immortal Jonson! with thy whip of steel Scourging the blood out of the dissolute age, Our sternest painter and our best! - Not thine * This gentleman is author of the "Lives of the Sacred Poets," a very well written and interesting work, including the best life of Withers extant: Mr. Wilmot has a fine Virgilian flow of poetry, and we hope will not want a friendly Mecenas. He is also, we believe, the author of some eloquent Reviews in the "Theological Quarterly." GENT. MAG. VOL. XII. 2 H Trampling beneath the thunder of thy line We do no think Gray's genius to be so happily or characteristically marked as the former; but the portrait is richly coloured, and the lines flow majestically. "Lord of the cittern! hail, amidst the throng, On the majestic river of thy song The lyric Muses walk'd-river that flowed, The leaves reflected on the sunny lawn, We must add that the embellishments of the Cambridge Portfolio are numerous, and many of them very tasteful, particularly the etchings by Mr. Lewis. The landscape plates by Cooke are graceful and pretty; but the architectural subjects are scarcely drawn with sufficient care, though they show an attentive eye to the most beautiful and interesting features of the University. There are some good portraits, as those of Caius and Harvey; but the busts of Bacon and Coke are absolutely bad: it requires as much practice and skill to draw from sculpture as from the life. SEAL OF ARCHBISHOP WALDEBY. not easy to say whether the Archbishop took his surname immediately from the place of his birth (as was frequently the custom with churchmen), or whether it came to him by descent from his parent. In the preceding generation there were two distinguished citizens of York, John de Waldeby, bailiff in 1357, and Richard de Waldeby, mayor in 1365; one of whom may have been his father. John de Waldeby, a very learned theologian, is stated to have been his brother. They were both educated in the Augustinian priory of Tickhill, and Dr. John afterwards became the provincial of the Augustinian order in England. He died in 1393; having written several able theological works, of which the titles are given by Leland and his followers.† Robert de Waldeby was a chaplain of Edward the Black Prince, whom * Promethean, with the penultimate accented, would be more correct. † The earlier biographers appear, however, to have confounded the works of the he accompanied into France, and, sojourning at the University of Thoulouse, he became professor of Divinity there, and was afterwards consecrated Bishop of the diocese of Aire, in Gascony. From that see he was promoted, in 1391, to the archbishopric of Dublin, and in the following year was made Chancellor of Ireland. In 1394 he contributed to the entertainment of Richard the Second when the king kept his Christmas in Dublin; and shortly after he was one of the Ambassadors sent to negociate the King's marriage with Isabel of France. Like some Englishmen of later times, Waldeby seems to have regarded a residence in Ireland as an expatriation, and in 1395 he was contented to resign his archiepiscopal dignity for the subordinate see of Chichester. However, in the following year, he not only recovered his former grade, but had the satisfaction of resuming it in the province of his own nativity. He survived little more than ten months, dying on the 6th Jan. 1397-8, when his body was buried in Westminster Abbey. His sepulchral effigy on brass plate is one of the few remaining in that edifice: it is a fine work of art, and has been three times engraved, by Cole, in Dart's Westminster Abbey; by Basire, in Drake's York; but more accurately in Mr. G. P. Harding's Antiquities in Westminster Abbey, 4to., 1825. The epitaph, of which the latter part only remains, is supplied in full, through Weever, from a MS. in Sir Robert Cotton's library : it is a compendious sketch, both of Waldeby's history and his character : Hic fuit expertus in quovis jure Robertus There were originally three shields of arms upon the slab: of which the central oneremains, being the favourite achievement of King Richard the Second,* viz. an impalement of the presumed arms of King Edward the Confessor, with the quarterly coat of France and England: but the two lateral shields have been long since removed. The seal we now publish is therefore valuable as showing what the arms of Archbishop Waldeby were. None of his seals for the sees of Dublin, Chichester, or York have hitherto come into the large collection formed by Mr. Doubleday, of Little Russellstreet; otherwise his personal arms might also be expected to be found upon them, as is the case with the seals of his contemporary Archbishop Arundel. The dexter side of the shield is oсcupied with an archiepiscopal pall surmounting a crosier; and these appear to have been the usual armorial insignia of the Archbishops of York, down to the period of the Reformamation. The same insignia, it is well known, continue to be borne by the Archbishops of Canterbury, at the present day; and also by the Archbishops of Armagh and Dublin. On what account the pall was relinquished by the Archbishops of York, unless it was for the sake of distinction from Canterbury, is perhaps not recorded; but it occurs so late as on the seal of Archbishop Edward Lee, consecrated in 1531. On all the monuments of Archbishops subsequent to the Reformation, the arms now used of a crown and cross-keys occur.t two brothers, and perhaps their history also; for it is sometimes stated that John was elected (though not confirmed) Archbishop of York. See Tanner, Bibliotheca Britannica; and Stevens, Monasticon, ii. 219. * Frequently displayed by his adherents: as on the seal of Archbishop Arundel (Archæologia, vol. XXVI, pl. xxx.); on a carving in the hall of Croydon Palace (Pugin's Specimens), and on the grave-stone of Sir Simon Felbriggs, his standard-bearer (Cotman's Norfolk Brasses); and in many other examples. † On the first, that of Archbishop Sandys, the cross-keys appear without the crown, according to Drake's print, p. 457, but that print is perhaps not to be depended upon. The latter had long before been given as the arms of the Church of York; and in that capacity we find it alone (that is, not impaled) on the seal before us. The cross-keys of course refer to St. Peter, to whom York minster is Peter dedicated and so does the crown, or tiara; for one mode of representing St. Peter was in the costume of the popes, and the crown, as engraved on the seal, is of the form of the papal crown, or tiara. After the Reformation this was altered to a royal crown, and in that form it has appeared on the monument of Archbishop Piers, who died in 1594, and so downwards to the coachpanels of his Grace the present Archbishop. It is remarkable that another seal was engraved for a distant place, exactly correspondent in pattern to that before us. We refer to the seal of the College founded at Maidstone by William Courtenay, Archbishop of Canterbury: one side of which is of the same size, has the same ornamental tracery, and a shield of the same size, bearing the pall of the see of Canterbury impaled with the personal arms of the Archbishop. Maidstone College was founded in 1395. Each of the matrices of our seal is furnished with four lateral rings; through which pins were passed, which had the effect of making the two impressions perfectly parallel and correspondent. These rings rendered any other handle unnecessary. The matrices are still preserved in or near Durham, but we have lost the name of their present possessor. The legend on both sides is the same, though somewhat differently constructed. At length it is to be read: " Sigillum Roberti Eboracensis Archiepiscopi Angliæ Primatis et domini Hextildesham." The lordship of Hextildesham, or Hexham, in Northumberland, belonged to the Archbishops of York from the reign of Henry the First to that of Queen Elizabeth, when Archbishop Holgate exchanged it for some abbey lands with the Crown. The Archbishops of York enjoyed in this manor very large and exclusive privileges, and a palatine jurisdiction, independ ant of the officers of the Crown. This circumstance accounts for so magnificent a seal being provided for this lordship. We can only conjecture the cause of the matrices having been preserved, instead of being broken up as was customary* on the day of the archbishop's funeral; but it may be imagined that, as Archbishop de Waldely survived for so short a time his promotion to the see of York, this seal might be never actually brought into official use, and may not have been delivered to the custody of his chancellor previously to his decease.t J. G. N. MR. URBAN, Ampton, Aug. 10. HAVING lately seen the transcript of a curious and ancient epistle (the genuine authenticity of which cannot be doubted, from the source by which it was derived), I beg leave to offer a copy of the same for insertion in your depository of literary curiosities; presuming it will throw a gleam of light on details of early domestic life, and gratify the taste of those of your readers who are interested in the transactions of former ages. THE DUKE OF NORFF'. zin, Wee greet you heartily well, You of your very faithfull good cosin. age, true heart and tendernesse to vs, shewed at all seasons to our honnor and your great charge, vnrewarded after yo' deserte, Natheless ye may hold for vndoughted it is established in our heartie remembrance, intendinge hereafter by one meane or other to acquitt vs soe both to you and yors, as wth God's mercie ye shall hold you proued truth and tendernes to vs warde right well bee sett. And, Cosin, howbeit as wee vnderstand nowe that there hath bin shewed you great occasion of displeasure by vnfittinge language, Wee promitt you it shall not bee vnredressed in short space and should haue been erre this time and wee had knowne it, Moreouer we late haue you in knowledge That as on monday next cominge my wife shall take her chamber And here shalbe my Lady my mooder, wth divers Worspll. Wherefore cosin wee specially pray you That it will like you to bee here and our Right entire cosin yor wife to beare companie for the season to our great honnor comfort and pleasure And that it like you to ease vs of as much of your plate as you may goodly forbeare wth, yee shall safely haue againe wth you and two peeces mor That we haue of yor. * See several instances in the Durham Wills, published by the Surtees Society. † Whilst on the subject of ancient seals, we shall take the opportunity to notice a manufactory of fabricated matrices which, we understand, has some time been carried on. We recently saw two specimens in a shop window in the neighbourhood of Covent Garden. They were casts in brass of seals which we well knew, duly soiled with dirt and verdigrease; but having handles, apparently taken from modern bronze inkstands, &c. which completely exposed their character to the experienced eye. There can be no objection to the perpetuation of ancient seals in so durable a material; but the actual value of such casts is as many shillings as pounds are demanded. These hints may tend to place the unwary virtuoso on his guard, as we have reason to believe some remarks we formerly gave on fabricated Anglo-Saxon coins attracted the atten. tion of the numismatic collectors. EDIT, here But in noe wise that you faile to come as wee specially trust you And that you will giue faith and credence to the Bearer hereof And our Lord p'serue you in his mercifull keepinge. Written in or Castle of Framlingh'm the Ninteenth day of Nouember. (Signed) NORFF'. To our right trustie and entirely beloved Cosin Sir William Calthorp, knight. It will have been perceived that the year is deficient to the date of this document; but it appears nearly conclusive from a passage in a letter from Sir John Paston, knt. to his brother John Paston, esq., dated between the 8th and 9th of November, 12th Edw. IV, 1472, that it was written in the same month and year. The passage alluded to is as follows: "And wheer ye goo to my Laydy off Norffolk, and wyll be theer att the takyng off hyr Chambre, I praye God spede yow, and Our Ladye hyr, to hyr plesur, wt as easye labor to overkom that she is abowt, as evyr had any Lady or Gentyllwoman saff Owr Lady heerselffe; and soo I hope she shall to hyr greet joye, an lall owres; and I prey God it maye be lyke hyr in worship, wytt, gentylnesse, and every thynge, excepte the verry verry thynge." -See the Paston Letters edited by Sir John Fenn, vol. ii, p. 118. Also in the letter of John Paston to his brother Sir John, replying to the preceding, and printed in the fifth volume, p. 38. "I have teryd her (tarried here) at Framlyngham thys seven nyght, for [my] lady took not hyr Chambyr till yesterday. Adew. Wretyn on Seynt Katyrin evyn." [Nov. 24; the feast of St. Katharine being the 25th Nov.] Should this conjecture be correct, of which I entertain no doubt, your readers scarcely need be told, that the writer was John Mowbray, the last of that name and family who enjoyed the dignity of Duke of Norfolk. His wife, just about to take her chamber* for the second time, was Elizabeth, eldest daughter of John Talbot, first Earl of Shrewsbury, by Margaret, his second wife, eldest daughter and coheir of Richard Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick; and the lady, his mother, who was expected, was Eleanor, only daughter of William Bourchier, Earl of Ewe, in Normandy, and now Duchess dowager of Norfolk. Sir William Calthorpe, knight, the personage to whom this letter is addressed, was the only son of Sir John Calthorpe, knight, by Amy his wife, sole daughter and heir of Sir John Wythe, knight, lord of Smalburgh and Worstede in Norfolk, and Hepworth in Suffolk. He was born about the year 1409, and on the death of Sir William Calthorpe, his grandfather, in 1420, he inherited the paternal nal estate; Sir John his father having died during the life-time of his grandfather. Sir William served the office of High Sheriff for Norfolk and Suffolk the twentieth of Henry VI, and on the 28th of June, the following year, held his court at Calthorp in Norfolk, when * There appear to have been some ceremonies anciently used when the Lady took her Chamber. It is stated, that when the Queen of Henry the Seventh took her Chamber "the Erles of Shrewsbury and of Kente hyld the Towelles, whan the Quene toke her Rightes; and the Torches ware holden by Knightes. Whan she was comen into hir great Chambre, she stode undre hir Cloth of Estate: then there was ordeyned a Voide of Espices and swet Wyne; that doone, my Lorde, the Quene's Chamberlain, in very goode wordes desired, in the Quene's name, the pepul there present to pray God to sende hir the goode houre: and so she departed to hir inner Chambre."-Strutt, vol. iii. p. 157, from a MS, in the Cotton Library. |